[ad_1]
Jamie Golombek: To deduct unreimbursed meals and lodging employment bills, a number of circumstances should be met

Critiques and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by way of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Some taxpayers attempt to write off the price of attending to work as a deductible expense for tax functions. However aside from the odd distinctive case, these bills are denied for the reason that Canada Income Company typically considers the price of driving backwards and forwards between dwelling and work as a non-deductible private expense.
Commercial 2
Article content material
However what for those who determine to remain at a lodge close to your employer’s office throughout the workweek to reduce your every day commute? Are you able to write off the price of your lodging, together with the price of meals whereas dwelling close to your work? Effectively, you possibly can actually attempt. One Ontario taxpayer did and nearly acquired away with it, till the CRA challenged the taxpayer’s employment bills and the matter ended up in Tax Courtroom.
Article content material
The current case concerned a commuter prepare operator for GO Transit, the regional public transit service for the Higher Toronto and Hamilton Space. The job required him to work from varied prepare stations throughout Ontario. The taxpayer usually resided in Prince Edward County, and the corporate’s dwelling terminal was Toronto’s Union Station.
Commercial 3
Article content material
The taxpayer reported taxable revenue of $130,640 in 2014 and $110,729 in 2015, and claimed employment bills on his tax return of $17,604 and $20,408, respectively. The employment bills consisted largely of lodging bills (about $11,000 in 2014 and $14,700 in 2015), and meals (almost $6,000 in 2014 and $5,700 in 2015).
The CRA initially assessed his tax returns for 2014 and 2015 as filed, however the company subsequently reassessed the taxpayer in 2016 and denied all his employment bills for each years.
The taxpayer defined he was required as a commuter prepare operator to work from varied prepare stations forming a part of the GO Transit community. On the trial, the taxpayer testified that in a normal working week, he would go away his dwelling in Prince Edward County on Sunday afternoon and head by automobile to Oshawa, returning dwelling solely on Friday evenings after his week’s remaining shift was over. The driving distance between his dwelling and Oshawa is roughly 160 kilometres, representing a driving time of just about two hours.
Commercial 4
Article content material
The taxpayer additional defined that he often began and completed work on the Oshawa GO prepare station and never at his employer’s dwelling terminal positioned in Toronto. Whereas away from dwelling, he typically stayed at a lodge near the Oshawa GO station or in Pickering, the place he rented an condominium close to its GO station for a interval of six or seven months in 2014, at a value of $9,500. He rented a unique Pickering condominium in 2015 at a value of $5,520, and commuted from there to the Oshawa GO station the place he labored.
There’s a particular rule within the Revenue Tax Act that permits transportation staff who’re recurrently required to be away from their dwelling municipality to deduct unreimbursed meals and lodging employment bills. To be entitled to deduct these bills, a number of circumstances should be met.
Commercial 5
Article content material
First, the employer’s principal enterprise should be transporting passengers, items or a mixture of each. The taxpayer can be required to recurrently journey away from the municipality the place the employer’s institution is positioned (that’s, the place the taxpayer reported to work). As well as, the taxpayer should journey on autos utilized by the employer to move these items or passengers. Lastly, the taxpayer should be required by their duties of employment to pay for meals and lodging whereas away from their dwelling municipality.
The worker on this case had a correctly accomplished and signed Canada Income Company Type T2200, Declaration of Circumstances of Employment, on which his employer licensed he was required to pay varied kinds of bills for which he wouldn’t be reimbursed. Underneath the “Circumstances of employment” part, his employer acknowledged he was required to journey to areas that weren’t his office whereas performing his employment duties.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The shape additionally famous that the employer required the worker to be away for 12 consecutive hours from the municipality and the metropolitan space the place he routinely reported for work. His employer acknowledged on the T2200 type that it doesn’t reimburse employment bills incurred by its staff.
The worker additionally accomplished and filed signed copies of the particular type for transit staff, Type TL2, Claims for meals and lodging bills, which the taxpayer connected to his 2014 and 2015 tax returns.
-
CRA denies taxpayer’s headhunter charges, however choose disagrees
-
CRA taken to court docket after denying assist funds as tax deductible
-
Alberta taxpayer tries to assert parking prices as a medical expense
-
CRA cracking down on COVID profit funds as one taxpayer came upon
Commercial 7
Article content material
Throughout his testimony, the taxpayer testified his every day work shift was greater than 12 hours per day, and he gave details about particular routes to indicate that. However when cross-examined about his every day work shift, the taxpayer acknowledged “that lots of his routes lasted lower than 12 hours and have been topic to separate shifts with interruption occasions.”
Based mostly on the proof, the choose mentioned the taxpayer had not established that his duties of employment required him to recurrently journey away from Oshawa, and away from the metropolitan space the place his employer was positioned, thus necessitating him to incur bills for meals and lodging. The choose famous that Oshawa is within the Durham Area, which is within the Higher Toronto Space. The taxpayer, subsequently, was not in a position to set up that the employment bills he claimed have been incurred outdoors the metropolitan space the place he reported to work.
“The deductions … (are) not meant for workers who determine, for private causes, to not return to their houses on the finish of every working day,” the choose concluded.
Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
_____________________________________________________________
If you happen to favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
_____________________________________________________________
[ad_2]